Recap Blog #8

The most influential discussion talks and lectures I had had been about NGOs and the humanitarian crisis, the lecture and discussion on climate change, human trafficking, and human rights.  In the unit on human trafficking I learned that education gives women, men, and children more empowerment, and thus reduces the risk of being trafficked.  Additionally, men are more likely to stand up and protect potential victims due to a change in perspective on rights of women and children through education.  Likewise, as a result of education, economic growth is promoted.  With an increase in educated populations, you can produce more productive members to society.  Despite the billions of dollars generated every year due to human trafficking, trafficking deprives countries of human capital.  With human trafficking, the poverty cycle is reinforced.  Therefore, the more value we place on potential victims through higher education, the more in value on economies is the likely end result.  Human trafficking also leads to the breakdown of social structures contributing to the cutting of cultural ties and the disintegration of families and communities when victims are being pulled away from their families.  Additionally, one of the Sustainable Development goals suggests that everyone be provided legal identities because so many victims of human trafficking are those that walk around with no sort of identification that allows the laws of the land to protect him or her, and thus can avoid the risk of being kidnapped and trafficked.  I learned about the Sustainable Development Goals and how they are co-laboring with the ‘Walk Free Foundation’ of Australia as a post-MDG goal.  The organization aimed to end modern slavery globally with its beginning in Australia.

I really enjoyed the lecture about human rights.  The speaker shed light and helped me to better understand what all the human rights were.  He showed the class the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  It was interesting to hear about the right to asylum and the right to migrate wherever and whenever.   This right was very controversial concerning whether the United States should admit Syrian refugees.  The issue of the right to migrate was very pressing when the discussion of the class switched over the climate change and the idea of their being climate refugees.  I learned of environmental issues being a human rights issue, and that our consumption of energy and production of greenhouse gases is a huge factor that negatively impacts the environment we live in.  From what I understood from the lecture is that our activities violate human rights.  How we choose to exist in this world has deeply affected countries and Island nations like Kiribati.  From the way we choose to manufacture our goods, or which way we choose to drive our cars, we are essentially denying the people of Kiribati their human rights such as the right to a healthy and hospitable environment, and the right to food and water.  The primary victims of harm to their environment are those of marginalized and impoverished communities with limited to no ability to participate in decision-making and public debate on environmental issues in order to achieve redress.  Their involvement is necessary due to the traditional knowledge of the Indigenous people have.  What I learned when researching my country, Australia about the topic of climate change and human rights, I learned that the Aboriginal people are victims of economic marginalization.  It was the drive for profit that altered how much carbon dioxide we breathe, the warmth of the climate, and sea levels, etc.  This in turn caused severe weather.  More waves came crashing against the shores, eroding the land, salinating the soils and more; pushing the indigenous people to the status of displaced refugees.  And the exploitation of their homelands continues.  In particular, to the indigenous, nature is life.  Australia ought to recognize that when it strips nature, the environment from them; it is stripping away their right to life.  When you take away one’s lands, waters, and natural resources, it is said to commit cultural genocide.  The essence of the Aboriginal culture is in their lands.  Also, I discovered through my research that given partial efforts made by Australian government, the native title is still being intentionally excluded from opportunity to address the indigenous disadvantage.  There have also been reports of dying infrastructure like housing and sewage that further exposed the indigenous to greater risks of diseases from flooded debris and insects like malaria and dengue fever.

I loved the discussion of controversial work of NGOs.  From the discussions I realized that if human rights were clearly woven and realized under rigid and enforceable international law, then aid organizations would be punished for violating the rights of those conflict-affected populations like the right to food, the right to water, and the right to security, etc.  However, until ethics can overcome politics, human rights will never be wholly realized, aid organizations will continue to serve the victims of war crimes and the abusers of these same exact crimes.  The same reason that violations of human rights as an effect of climate change is the exact same reason why the operations of aid organizations were highly undermining and contradictory, and that reason was MONEY.

 

Last Blog Entry # 8

  1. Which guest lecture did you find most informative, inspiring, and/or challenging? Write a short reflection stating your reasons.

There were many great lectures that I could learn and remind the importance of something I took it for granted. Such as neglect to abusing water, environment and waste. Also, studies about human rights including poverty, women’s rights and education. The most interesting lecture that I heard was on September 27th, about Myanmar(Burma). The country recently adopted democratic policies. I did not know Myanmar used to have different name and consist of approximately 135 ethnic groups and diverse culture. The main reason why I become interested to Burma is because of its education system and student’s reaction.

burma-student

In Burma, student does not have much freedom in school compare to the United States students. Students in Burma are fighting for educational freedom. After the lecture and discussion about Myanmar, I become more interested about Burma, so I researched more about Burma. They have potential to be developed in short time by its substantial amount of natural resources and low cost of labor fee. They can develop their country in very short period like China did. I hope school policy develop as soon as possible and let student have freedom and right to choose what they want to study and where they want to go. Not only school policy but I also hope Burma resolve ethical and political issues in short future.

  1. What insights did you gain doing research on your country?

I was very happy to study and research about New Zealand. I was an exchange student to learn English in New Zealand for a semester about fourteen years ago. I was very young so I was not able to see any problems around the world. The only thing that I remember about New Zealand was beautiful nature and animal species only lives in New Zealand. However, after doing research, I was very sad and disappointed because of ongoing problems in New Zealand and hope everyone know about problems in New Zealand. Insights that I could gain through research are: global warming, human trafficking, and human rights in New Zealand.

nz

Global warming is an ongoing problem and everyone need to aware of the problem and start to prevent it. Through research, I could learn about result of global warming, such as climate changes in New Zealand, loss of profit in fishery industry. Maori, indigenous people, who are vulnerable to climate change, their problems and difficulties to maintain their life. Maori people usually make money from nature such as fishing and farming. Due to climate change, they cannot make enough profits. Also many animal species only lived in New Zealand were decreasing due to climate changes.

2011_safe_winter_chill_southafrica_australia_nz

Human trafficking is also a major problem in New Zealand. Since many Pacific Islanders are coming to New Zealand to find a job, some of New Zealand people make them modern slaves in many ways. They do not pay minimum wages to pacific islander for working in their farms and sell them to become prostitutes. Some of Asian female student lured to come New Zealand for make money such as $4,000 per month and Visa will be supports, but in fact, when she arrives to New Zealand, her passport was taken by gangsters and sent to prostitute place.

Human rights is big problem in New Zealand, Maori or pacific islander are not having enough education or health care compare to European immigrants in New Zealand. Accordingly, poverty rates, imprisoned rates, and mortality rates are high in Maori groups. The government of New Zealand try to resolve these problems by establishing schools teach with Maori language and hire more doctors who can speak Maori language in order to treat Maori people better than before.

download

I learned that there are many ongoing problems in New Zealand. Even if the government of New Zealand and many NGO work to resolve the problems in New Zealand, if people do not recognize the problem and are aware of it, problems cannot be solved. I believe, the first step of reducing problem in the New Zealand, is everyone recognize problem.

 

Australia deals with human trafficking Blog #7

When we think of slavery, we usually flash back to lectures in a boring Eighth grade American history class and immediately thing of the antebellum period and the enslavement of Africans to Colonial America.  It is because of this instant flashback that no one really is aware that modern day slavery exists, nor do they understand that such a crime poses such a great threat to society.  Modern day slavery, sex trafficking/human trafficking, sex slavery has been on the rise of decades, is dangerous, and is a successful business.  How can it be all these t things?  Sex slavery is thus so because it is a crime of creatively pure deception, which is why so many people are so oblivious to its prominent existence.  When I drive down the highway headed west down I-70 all I see are strip club advertisements on its buildings.  When I see them, I think, “how many of these strippers are doing this for school, for their kids, just by overall choice, and how many do not get to go home after this?”  When I was in Northern Brazil, all the billboards advertising motels had words like “passion” or “paradise” with a female in lingerie.  Usually, motels are to emphasize “comfort” and “just like home.”  So why are these motels suggesting sex?  Were they legitimate motels or brothels in disguise?  Lastly, a friends of mine who is now a case worker working in Las Vegas in specifically with human trafficking told me how disgusted she was with all the billboard advertisements ads that covered the streets, ads being passed out in multitudes like old men passing out mini New Testament bibles, and human traffickers partnering with real families to deceive men, women, and children into becoming sex slaves themselves.  Victims of the sex trade only see little of life before they see the very worst of life for a majority of his or her life.  No longer can the issue of sex trafficking be resolved by buying back a victim’s freedom.  The loss of a sex slaves is temporarily compensated by the abolitionist; however, the trafficker could always use the money to find new victims.  Therefore, emancipating one at the expense of many is not the answer.  There has to be another way.

The “Born Free” article written by Sara E. Mendelson discusses the Sustainable Development Goals effective as of 2016. As a part of the Sustainable Development Movement, human trafficking is being called to an end requiring effort from all governments, communities, citizens, and other parties directly and indirectly involved.  To eradicate sex trafficking, one of the SDGs calls for the press of education upon females, and specifically on gender equality and empowerment.  When girls and boys understand their rights, they understand they have value.  They will be aware of the typical behavior of traffickers, what they look like, where they are, who are their targets, and when do they target and are the most active.  Mendelson mentions airlines and other transportation agencies that require their staff members to recognize human trafficking.  Education gives women, men, and children more empowerment, and thus reduces the risk of being trafficked.  Additionally, men are more likely to stand up and protect potential victims due to a change in perspective on rights of women and children through education.  Likewise, as a result of education, economic growth is promoted.  With an increase in educated populations, you can produce more productive members to society.  Despite the billions of dollars generated every year due to human trafficking, trafficking deprives countries of human capital (“I.Introduction”).  With human trafficking, the poverty cycle is reinforced.  Therefore, the more value we place on potential victims through higher education, the more in value on economies is the likely end result.  Goal six of the SDGs sets out to “Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels (“Born Free”).  Trafficking fuels organized crime.  The revenue generated from sex trafficking provides funding and easier facilitation of drug trafficking, human smuggling, money laundering, and terrorist activities.  “Where organized crime flourishes, governments and the rule of law are weakened” (“I.Introduction”).  Human trafficking also leads to the breakdown of social structures contributing to the cutting of cultural ties and the disintegration of families and communities when victims are being pulled away from their families.  Additionally, one of the Sustainable Development goals suggests that everyone be provided legal identities because so many victims of human trafficking are those that walk around with no sort of identification that allows the laws of the land to protect him or her, and thus can avoid the risk of being kidnapped and trafficked.

The article also discuses that those that created the Sustainable Development Goals have and are co-laboring with the ‘Walk Free Foundation’ of Australia as a post-MDG goal.  The organization aims to end modern slavery globally with its beginning in Australia.  In addition, in dealing with sex slavery, Australia has devoted $8.5 million to fund its anti-trafficking project (http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/australia-tips-bt250m-help-people-trafficking-asean-0

).  Thailand, along with Burma, Lao, and Cambodia have victims trafficked to Australia and have teamed up with Australia to fight human trafficking locally and globally.  As part of the anti-trafficking project, Australia grants visas to trafficked victims (legal identities).

 

 

 

Works Cited

 

http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/australia-tips-bt250m-help-people-trafficking-asean-0

“I. Introduction (revised).” U.S. Department of State. U.S. Department of State, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2016.

Mendelson, Sarah. E.  “Born Free” Sept. 22, 2014.  Print. australia-sexslaverysex-traffickslave2-copy

Blog#7

  1. Sex trafficking, sex slavery is an issue in New Zealand.

human-trafficking

According to the U.S. State Department, New Zealand had title of a “source country” for sex trafficking of underage girls and a destination country for modern slavery. Also New Zealand classified as a “tier one” country, which mean that New Zealand only have minimum standards and have one of the worst system for protecting trafficking victims in the world (Donnell . 2012).

There are many reason to become victims of sex trafficking. One of reason is the gang trafficking rings. A recent example is Malaysian sex worker who need help from police to retrieve her passport back from her brothel owner. She said she were lure by $5600 to come to Auckland, New Zealand to be prostitute. However, was later told that it was a loan she had to repay (Tan. 2010).

sex-trafficking

Furthermore, hundreds of young women in New Zealand are selling themselves for sex on a classified ad website. Advertisement offering a “very pretty Maori girl” or “Caribbean beauty”. The ads show a photo of the women and a biography explaining their physical features, including available sexual services (Carville. 2016)

It is not easy to find sexual trafficking until prostitute report themselves. According to agency of immigration of New Zealand, Nigel Bickle, after his interview in Auckland brothel, prostitutes were satisfied and there were no indications of exploitations.  To reduce and protect sex trafficking, the government and the labor department are research into international best practice in supporting and protecting victims (Tan. 2010).

 

  1. The article (pdf) Born Free talks about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which came into effect in 2016. Find out if human trafficking is addressed by one of the goals? What needs to be done to combat human trafficking?

bornfree

According to the article Born Free, after 2015, in the world, we might actually see a significant decline in human trafficking including, buying and selling of children, women and men. To reduce and remove human trafficking, Sustainable Development goals are used by the Outcome Documents. Under proposed goal five, no matter genders and sex, everyone should be equal. Under the eighth goal, promote sustained, sustained economic growth, and place must be able to work. These proposal urges the end of the trafficking of children and soldiers by 2025. There are also sub-goals which can start to eliminate trafficking, “provide[ing] legal identity for all including birth registration,” promoting “sustainable tourism,’ and “sustainable transport systems…with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children with disabilities…” (Mendelson 2014).

bornfreeunicef

According to UNICEF, combatting organized crime, promoting the rule of law, and reducing all forms of violence are all connected to ending trafficking in the world. Which include end abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children. These goals cannot be achieved if we do not work together. The National Human Trafficking Resource Center in the United States has launched a Global Hotline Network, UNICEF had launched The Global Partnership to End Violence Against Children in order to accomplish the goal of eliminating trafficking. Also it is important to have access to decent, stable job. Since poverty is one of the root causes for slavery and human trafficking. Situations of desperation are created when families cannot have food, health care or unavailability of education. Many reason for human trafficking begin with an individual’s hope to get a decent job. If nation truly concern and invest in economic opportunities, it will reduce human trafficking. As the SDG’s will integrate the three core dimensions of sustainable development: the social, the economic and the environmental – UNICEF’s message is that sustainable development starts with safe, healthy, and well-educated children (UNICEF, 2016)

 

 

 

 

Donnell, H. (June 20, 2012). NZ Criticized for Sex-Trafficking and Slavery. Nzherald.co.nz. Retrieved from              http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10814256

Tan, L. (Aug 4, 2010). NZ’s Sex-Slave Cases ‘Slip Under Radar’. Nzherald.co.nz. Retrieved from.  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10663446

Carville, O. (Sep 22, 2016). Exposed: The Dark Underbelly of Human Trafficking in New Zealand. Nzherald.co.nz. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11711211

Mendelson, SE. (Sept 22, 2014). Born Free: How to Prevent Human Trafficking.

UNICEF. (Jan 29, 2016). End Trafficking Campaign: The Sustainable Development Goals that Aim to End Human Trafficking. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicefusa.org/stories/sustainable-development-goals-aim-end-human-trafficking/29864

Post #6

  1. What are the principal concerns Linda Polman raises in her book?

 

The purpose of humanitarian aids were to helping the poor and who need help. However, most of donated money for humanitarian aids are using for different purpose, including supporting warlords. Also, private aid operations and charitable organizations have commercial interests rather to help people and stay neutral. Also Polman discussed about what happened in Goma. Indiscriminate aids ultimately caused bigger conflict and then genocide. Which support the idea that humanitarian aids and donate money somehow worsening the situation.

download

 

  1. Why does she say “Aid organizations are businesses dressed up like Mother Teresa” (p. 177)? 3.

 

Polman talking about NGOs not having enough regulations and journalists easily approve NGO without enough suspicious or qualification. When journalists are sent in to report of the aid situation and process, they are just report and interview around by the aid providers. Journalists do not interview refugees or neighbors for situation. They don’t report about dark side of aid organization. Such as bribing of the warlord and supporting money not for people really need help. Reporters does not question about workers in NGO, such as their certifications. Workers in NGO provide medical treatment but not all of them have certification. Which mean that NGO have not enough regulation and restriction. Finally, Polman mentioned that even if aid organizations says their main concern to help people in needs and improve but organizations might be just doing business to make money.

 

1304973560299-cached

  1. What do journalists, the public, governments have to do to make humanitarian aid successful?

In order to make humanitarian aid successful, Journalist are deliver of the situation to newspaper readers and to government officers to realize and aware of situation. According to Polman, most donor governments and private donors give money based on newspaper headline. Which should lead supporters to have right awareness instead of false awareness to help business purpose NGO to make money.

Public should not always trust on media and always questions about where this money will be used. Polman hope readers and public to be as informed as possible. Such as which location they are supporting and the goal and plan of NGO. Understand about the culture, economic system and social environment where they will provide aids. Also know about the NGOs’ plan and whether that organizations become more alike business organizations. Public should aware of situation before they send money to organization.

Government has duty to ensure the welfare of its citizens. Government’s priority concern must be take care of its citizens always, including recovery from natural disasters, government should help its citizens as much as they can. Polman recommended that both the government and NGO work together to support humanitarian crisis.Polman says the government should not expect humanitarian aid to step in and do their job for them. Instead the government should take care of its citizen during wartime. She recommends that both the government and NGOs work together to assist humanitarian problem.

 

palestinian-journalist

 

Polman, Linda. (2010). The Crisis Caravan: What’s Wrong with Humanitarian Aid?. Translated by Liz Waters.  Metropolitan Books.

Involuntary Aid for the War Economy Post #6

Author of her chapter, “Aid as a Weapon of War,”  Linda Polman offers excellent scholarly opinion and insight on the many humanitarian crises that has plagued the globe like the Holocaust, Goma, Bosnia, Sri Lanka, Rwanda, and Iraq, etc.  During my academic career, I have grown up learning that of course providing aid to countries at war is a good thing.  The problem was that countries like the United States were not providing enough of it.  The United States’ refusal to provide aid can be best explained by its own protection from potential political backlash once the public starting to figure out that the country is essentially funding warlords.  Polman discussed many concerns about aid organizations and their humanitarian failures that are inevitable once they start operating in any given designated country.

Linda asks at the end of her chapter, “Can humanitarians be accused of fuelling or prolonging the conflicts in these countries” (Polman 105)?  The simple answer to this question is yes, but now we are left with the question, will they be accused of such wrongdoing?  How can a government, an INGO auditor, or whoever accuse an aid worker without substantial evidence ever being present?  I learned that when in court, it is not about who is truly guilty or innocent, but it is about what can be proven in court.  Polman criticizes that there is no regular means of assessing performance of aid organizations.  There is no way to tracking the flows of funding and the distribution of supplies.  Polman wrote that most aid organizations do not even care to report the details of their operations.  The reason is primarily for the sake of donations.  If such reports were thoroughly being sought out, they would prove that the INGOs works are ineffective and ultimately destructive to not only the humanitarian cause, but to the conflict-affected populations.  The aid to aid workers so that they can continue to provide more aid would be stunted.  That is why aid reports are deliberately never documented.

When I think of the question of could humanitarians be accused of fuelling or prolonging the conflicts in war-torn countries I think back to the debate of the integration environmental issues and human rights.  If human rights were clearly woven and realized under rigid and enforceable international law, then aid organizations would be punished for violating the rights of those conflict-affected populations like the right to food, the right to water, and the right to security, etc.  However, until ethics can overcome politics, human rights will never be wholly realized, aid organizations will continue to serve the victims of war crimes and the abusers of these same exact crimes.  The same reason that violations of human rights as an effect of climate change is the exact same reason why the operations of aid organizations are highly undermining and contradictory, and that reason is MONEY.  Polman commented that when aid convoys come rolling in, contract fever sets in.  Competition for donations intensifies; therefore, “INGOs, journalists, and MONGOs are free to make private agreements, pacts, contracts with wannabe rebel and tribal leaders” (Polman 97).  She calls it “shaking hands with the devil.”  “”Humanitarian territories” in war zones are free markets where anyone can” sell off his aid (Polman 97).  One of the solutions suggested was that aid organizations ought to stop competing against one another and begin to work as a collective unit.  Polman accused aid organizations of possessing a “me-first” mindset.  The needs of the organization surpass those that are being tortured and killed by war criminals.  As long as an aid organization can survive getting through a war zone by paying a rebel leader and getting theirs, that is all that really matters.  And because INGOs’ needs such as housing are provided by local war elites, becoming an involuntary collaborator to genocide is a seemingly “necessary evil.”  However, this “me-first” mindset of needing to cater to war criminals comes at a price of aid organizations being manipulated and abused by those that they are funding.  This is the aid industry.

The aid industry is but a reflection of the industry plague that has engulfed every economy, every nation around the world.  Aid organizations are truly businesses dressed up like Mother Theresa.  Aid organizations are supposed to heal in the aid of human suffering, yet are driven by their own private, hidden agendas.  Aid organizations would be opportunistic angels if such even existed.  Everything is exploited, always and made a business, and it is a tragic shame.  “There are no rules or agreements about ethical boundaries, and NGOs make decisions about where to work based not primarily on ethical considerations, but on the availability of donor contracts” (Polman 175).  When aid organizations inevitably fail their ultimate mission, they deflect their failures by blaming the international community for lack of political will to avert crises.  Afterwards, aid works learn lessons, execute “improvements” and the cycle just starts all over again.  Aid organizations must stop making recommendations and unenforceable rules.  They must take actual control of their resources and operations, instead of being the ones controlled so that contributions to the war economy will be minimized and actual aid work can be achieved.

Works Cited

Polman, Linda, and Liz Waters. “Aid as a Weapon of War.” War Games: The Story of Aid and    

War in Modern times. London: Viking, 2010. N. pag. Print.

How Environmental Issues Are Human Rights Violations Blog #5

Recently, we have learned of the potential of environmental issues as human rights issues, especially rights of minority groups like the indigenous populations.  Previously, we discovered that the fight for the environment is a fight indeed with every money-hungry politician backed by large corporations.  The same opponents are being fought by the indigenous people concerning their human rights.  The rights of the indigenous many times are forced to submit under a certain legal system that greatly places limits on how they can, or should live.  Daan Borhorst in “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” defined rights “primarily as a legal concept, an advantage grated under a certain legal system” (Borkhorst 14).  However, to whom or to what is this advantage being granted unto?  What has the authority to grant, or honor a right to another, and why does she, he, or it have that kind of authority?  History has taught us repeatedly that authority and power in leadership is abusive, parasitic, and never just.  According to the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” a small, yet powerful “majority” has denied, ignored, , and stripped a larger ,yet weaker in power “minority” of all these rights.  Dark times like the enslavement of Africans, the Holocaust, every genocide that has occurred on this earth, etc. have been stripped of rights to integrity like life, education, food, edible food, water, drinkable water, decent shelter, privacy, proper clothing, and freedom, etc.  I believe it is safe to say there is an unspeakable right to “say no,” that all victims of all these heinous events have suffered through.  Borkhorst also mentioned there being socio-economic rights, which are “a dignified material and spiritual existence for everybody” (Borkhorst 15).  And of course, collective rights such as the right to peace, and the use and development of natural resources.  The right to a healthy environment to all is unprecedented in nature.  As the world around us continues to urbanize and industrialize, the after effect of climate change takes course, and then intensifies.  Changes to our climates have done nothing but develop actual environmental crises that will continue to severely devastate our health, the way we live, and our overall lives in general.  When we continue to cut down our trees, poison our waters, pollute the air we breathe, consume more than we can produce we are basically denying ourselves the most important right that is of live.  Every day we are deliberately choosing to live a waning, mediocre life in exchange for more profit and more power.

Mediocre living requires complete disregard to quality; and that describes perfectly countries like Australia and the United States.  Nevermind that our drinkable water is running scant.  Nevermind that one day everyone is going to have to start wearing gas masks.  Nevermind that just by the way we start each day as we get up every morning, that we are essentially forfeiting our right to quality of life; as long as one nation remains powerful over another by wealth and resources, life can be semi-good and that is ok.  It is truly baffling how we as a collective body can violate our own right to life.  It is easy to see that we are bringing thousands of species to the brink of extinction, but have no idea that we are doing the same thing to the human race as we speak, starting with indigenous people.  Any rational attempt made by activists and just ordinary citizens that simply want to live in a clean environment to defend their rights to the land and environment face legal harassment, intimidation, and violence.  The primary victims of harm to their environment are those of marginalized and impoverished communities with limited to no ability to participate in decision-making and public debate on environmental issues in order to achieve redress.  Writer Neena Bhandari discusses climate change as a threat to the Aboriginal people of Australia.  She predicts, “climate change will further marginalize Australia’s Aboriginal communities” pushing them out of their traditional lands, killing their culture, and stripping away adequate access to water resources (Bhandari 1).  Aboriginal people are victims of economic marginalization.  It was the drive for profit that altered how much carbon dioxide we breathe, the warmth of the climate, and sea levels, etc.  This in turn caused severe weather.  More waves came crashing against the shores, eroding the land, salinating the soils and more; pushing the indigenous people to the status of displaced refugees.  And the exploitation of their homelands continue.  In particular, to the indigenous, nature is life.  Australia ought to recognize that when it strips nature, the environment from them, it is stripping away their right to life.  When you take away one’s lands, waters, and natural resources, it is said to commit cultural genocide.  The essence of the Aboriginal culture is in their lands.  Even though “the indigenous people have the smallest ecological footprint, they are expected to carry the heaviest burden of climate change” (Bhandari 1).  After the Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd signed the Kyoto Protocol on climate change committing itself to “reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 25% below 2000 levels by 2020,” the government has been urged into new partnerships with indigenous Australians concerning climate change policy and planning.  Australia is now highly considering getting the indigenous involved.  It understands the knowledge that the indigenous people carry and understand how valuable their involvement in the responses to climate change will be.  However, Australian law and policy do not recognize Indigenous rights to water seeing as how 90% of the water is used to irrigate agricultural lands (Bhandari1).  Bhandari also discussed ‘cultural flows’ which signifies “a legal entitlement to water allocations for indigenous peoples to deliver to sites of cultural and ecological significant which would also support maintenance of cultural practices and medicinal plants” (Bhandari 1).  However, Queensland South Native Title Services official Kevin Smith criticizes Australian law concerning the Indigenous.  He says that the native title system is in great need of reform due to its confusing, poorly fitted legislative functions and its complicated and unfair claim processes, especially with the heavy burden of proof on the Indigenous.  Given partial efforts made by Australian government, the native title is still being intentionally excluded from opportunity to address the indigenous disadvantage.  There have also been reports of dying infrastructure like housing and sewage that further exposed the indigenous to greater risks of diseases from flooded debris and insects like malaria and dengue fever.  Kevin Smith concludes the article declaring that “implementing a broader land settlement framework, where native title is means to an end, not an end in itself” (Bhandari 1).  We cannot continue to be Eurocentric in mind and exploit lands, marginalize, and displace populations for profit and other selfish reasons at the expense of a healthy environment and right to life.

 

 

Works Cited

Bhandari Neena. “AUSTRALIA: Climate Change – Further Threat to Aboriginals.” Inter    Press Service. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2016.

Borkhorst, Daan. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” N.p.: n.p., n.d. 6-35. Print.

 

 

Post#5

Climate change is one of the most serious global health threats of the 21st century. It is already causing significant morbidity, with impacts predicted to increase significantly over coming decades. Leading health threats include fresh water and food shortages, extreme weather, increasing level of sea water, disease, and psychological stress. Vulnerability to the health effects of climate change varies between populations, geographic location, demographics including socioeconomic status, background burden of climate- related health conditions, health system capability, and capacity to adapt new conditions. According to the UNESA, climate change is a potential threat to indigenous people’s existence and a major issue of human rights and equity (Jones, R., Bennett, H., Keating, G., & Blaiklock, A. 2016). According to Elizabeth Lindsey, in Micronesia, indigenous people, have not enough food, medicine, no running, and no electricity (Elizabeth. 2012).

post-5

In New Zealand, climate change impacts on the wider cultural, social, and economic determinants of heath for Maori, indigenous people in New Zealand. Experience in recent decades shows that Maori and other socially disadvantaged groups tend to experience uneven health outcomes from economic changes that increase social inequality. Firstly, indigenous relationships with the natural environment are critical and Maori explicitly consider a healthy environment to be a prerequisite for food health. The loss of identity due to displacement and dispossession of lands, resources, and waters is closely related to adverse physical and mental health outcomes. The Maori economy is disproportionately invested in climate-sensitive primary industries, and is likely to experience significant adverse effects from global environmental and socioeconomic trends as a result of climate change. Losses in the Maori economy will increase unemployment and reduce average income (Jones, R., Bennett, H., Keating, G., & Blaiklock, A. 2016).

post-5

To alleviate disproportionate, there are some obligations arising from the right to health are subject to neither resource constraints nor progressive realization, but are of immediate effect. The duty to avoid discrimination on the basis of characteristics such as race, sex, language, and disability is also effective immediately. In New Zealand, Maori can be fully engaged in decision making on issues that affect their taonga, including health (Jones, R., Bennett, H., Keating, G., & Blaiklock, A. 2016)

post5

Scientists, economists, and politicians from around the world have emphasized that the global community must take drastic and immediate action if the worst effects of climate change are to be avoided (Steger, 2009. p 95). Government must reduce carbon emission, including phasing out subsidies for fossil fuel. They must also help people adapt to climate change, and provide compensation, for example to those who have lost their homes because of rising sea levels (Carvalho, S. 2015).   Since 2013, New Zealand has started to systematically delineate the legal protection framework applicable to claims based on the effects of climate change. New Zealand’s jurisprudence provides the most comprehensive analysis by decision makers to date about the scope and content of protection for refuges of casualties of climate change (Mcadam, 2015).

post-5

According to Farisa, eurocentrism denotes the emerging perception within the European cultural historical experience of European identity as good or less advanced. Jacques Derrida mentioned that Europe can no longer force other cultures to accept its values and lifestyle because liberal democracy in the West has failed in many respects. Such as, racism, class divisions, economic oppression and sociocultural inequalities have become too pervasive in the Western world.  Living in a multicultural world means live with different, culturally-specific interpretations of fundamental values such as human rights and liberties. If one attempt to engage with the other, and if one try to appreciate the different cultural understandings of human rights and liberties, one will at least have taken the first step beyond the politics of essentialism and ethnocentrism (Farisa).

 

 

Jones, R., Bennett, H., Keating, G., & Blaiklock, A. (July 1, 2016). Climate Change and the Right to Health for Maori in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Health and Human Rights Journal. Volume 16, Number 1. Retrieved from

https://www.hhrjournal.org/2014/07/climate-change-and-the-right-to-health-for-maori-in-aotearoanew-zealand/

Steger, M B. (2009). Globalization: A very short introduction. (2Ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press

Carvalho, S. (December 11, 2015). What has Climate Change got to do with Human Rights?. Amnesty International New Zealand. Retrieved from

https://www.amnesty.org.nz/what-has-climate-change-got-do-human-rights

McAdam, J. (March, 2015). The Emerging New Zealand jurisprudence on climate change, disasters and displacement. Migration Studies. Volume 3 Issue 1. Retrieved from

http://migration.oxfordjournals.org/content/3/1/131.abstract

Farisa, A. Noor. The Need for a Multicultural Understanding of Human Rights. Beyond Eurocentrism. Retrieved from

https://bblearn.missouri.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-2894916-dt-content-rid-29444247_1/courses/FS2016.GERMAN.3510.01/Dealing%20With%20Human%20Rights%20Ch3.pdf

Elizabeth, L. (April 8, 2012). Ancient Wisdom for a Modern World: Dr. Elizabeth Lindsey at TEDxMaui. YouTube. Retrieved from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrmZUqcVdow

 

Environmental concerns for Australia and the Rest of the World Post #4

Globalization assembled by capitalist ideology and democratic dreams, global warming, climate changed has affected every corner of the globe.  Being a prosperous nation is a good thing, sure!  But to what end exactly? As a global community, everyone has to start thinking in the long-run about human activities and their effects on the environment, and consequently physical and social well-being of humans.  I truly believe that this present generation, the here and now is the last chance the planet and the human race have got to overcome all the global challenges that we have created.  If we do not stop while we are still ahead, we will have nothing.  Corporate America may have its mountains of money, but it will have no trees, no oceans, wasted away lands, no real food, and no people, let alone healthy people to show for it.  Globalization requires greed, national pride, competition that we just love so much, and ultimately a disregard for life in general.  Like the United States, the global community is in denial about us as humans being our own worst enemies, and that oftentimes we get in our way with many things like peace, happiness, and good health.  For example, the way the United States blames ISIS for terrorism, even though the nation created ISIS just shows how incapable the United States is in demonstrating accountability and responsibility.  One of the chapters from the book Moral Ground mentioned that we cannot plan for something that we cannot see, and what we cannot see does not exist (Moral Ground 25).  We are so short-term in our thinking that it is rendered unnecessary to think and plan for the future.  And the effects of climate change are hard to see for American corporations.  Thus, for them no such environmental issues pose enough threat to foster change.  The only threat corporations are choosing to see is an economic threat if they choose to cross over to the greener side.  And of course, how could it be easy to see with dollar signs for pupils?  How can it be easy to think when money poisons the mind, distorts judgment, and cause people to do desperate things?  How can environmental issues compete with economic interests? Well, one thing we know for sure is that because everything is driven by profit, corporations like the ones in the United States need to be bought just as easily as their politicians and naive media disciples are.  Strategic marketing of environmental issues is the only viable solution for a world that is all about business.

It is our (as a global community) moral obligation to take genuine and diligent action to protect the future of a planet in peril.  Despite what the corporations perceive to be of greater importance, thinking of the future allows us to sustain all life in the present and the only shot we have if the human race is ever going to survive.  Cloutier in Moral Ground discussed the threat of climate change on the indigenous Inuit people.  He called it human-induced climate change.  According to Cloutier, environmental issues are not just about the environment to the Inuit, but it is also about the indigenous and culture of the people.  The Inuit people thrive in a cold environment.  However, due to the rise of temperatures as a result of global warming, the Inuit will no longer be able to practice their way of life anymore (https://bblearn.missouri.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-2894966-dt-content-rid-29444434_1/courses/FS2016.GERMAN.3510.01/Moral%20Ground%20-%2021-31%281%29.pdf).  Unfortunately, many governments like the United States take the short-term view that is favored by many businesses.  Cloutier helped me to understand climate change as a human rights issue.  With countries like the United States and Australia being individualistic nations, if the media can truly portray environmental issues as human rights for concern for all without appearing “too drastic”, I believe things will begin to change.  Things like there actually being a motive, an inspiration, a desire, and an urge to take better care of our planet.

In Australia, organizations like 350.or Australia and WWF work locally and collaborate with other nations to raise awareness concerning climate change.  In particular, WWF works to preserve biodiversity and achieve sustainable development throughout our planet.  Melbourne.350 urges the state to change banks to ones that do not lend to fossil fuel projects.  Specifically, in Australia, climate change has brought about a high influx of invasive species, which are newly introduced plants and animals.  Due to these changes, natural resources like water have become scarce while the distribution and abundance of most of Australia’s species is fading away.  As a result of globalization, there exists deforestation in Australia.  As trees are being cut down, the salinity of the soil increases.  Therefore, when it rains, or is being drained, the water quality is deeply affected.  “Around 7% of the agricultural area of western Australia is suffering “due to deforestation (“Environmental Problems in Australia” 2).  Soils in Australia have grown weaker in its ability to recover from deforestation with a $1 billion land degradation cost every year (http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/australia/environmental_problems_in_australia/).  Intensive agriculture and overgrazing has promoted desertification and erosion, which is a factor affecting the spread of invasive plants.  The fact that there exists low biological productivity in fish and intensive overfishing has suppressed growth of overall marine life.  With the introduction of new species, Australia gains about “20 new pests or diseases each year” (http://wwf.panda.org/who_we_are/wwf_offices/australia/environmental_problems_in_australia/).  New species like feral cats, rabbits, and foxes have caused significant extinctions locally, especially for native species as a result of habitat modification and predation (“Environmental Issues in Australia”).  Lastly, aside from water pollution, the underdeveloped infrastructure due to intense, exponential population growth along the coastlines has caused a large displacement of highly valuable biodiversity and arable lands.  Rest assured, Australia is not alone in the many challenges climate change brings upon a nation’s people and it never will be because globalization requires a sense of community, collaboration, and interdependence.  Therefore, every nation ought to fall into step with Australian organizations like 350.org Australia, or WWF in order to bring about real change on this planet.  We must as a collective body believe with our hearts and minds that environmental concern is a human rights issue in order for us to be really moved.

 

 

Works Cited

 

“Environmental Problems in Australia.” WWF Conserves Our Planet, Habitats, & Species like                       the Panda & Tiger. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Oct. 2016.

Watt – Cloutier, Sheila. “The Inuit Right to Culture Based on Ice and Snow.” Moral Ground.               N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Web. 2 Oct. 2016.

 

Post #4

glacier-melting-300x199Global warming is serious ongoing problem in the world. People who are in urban area might know about the problem but mostly they do not take it seriously since they never experienced. Currently, earth is losing its “fresh water-bank” every second due to global warming and it directly affects people who are leaving in the Arctic. Rapid climate change caused unbelievable breakdown of Inuit’s society in Arctic, where have the highest suicide rates in North America. Ice and snow are their highways that bring them out to the supermarkets and key environment which link them each other and to other society. Due to losing ice and snow, land scape has eroded, contaminated drinking water, the coastal losses and causing animal species extinction. Currently, many or marine species dependent on sea ice, including polar bears, birds, and walrus are declined. On December 7, 2005, 63 Inuit from Canada and Alaska filed a legal complaint to defend their culture and their way of life. The purpose was not asking for the world to take a complete economic backward step but using appropriate technologies that limit the pollution which causing Arctic melting.  Inuit people want to want to defend right of their culture, rights to lands traditionally used and occupied, and their rights to residence and movement (Moore, D.K., & Nelson, P, M. (2011).

inuit

Everyone in the world have a moral obligation to take action to protect the future of a planet in peril. It is not something can be solved in short time, since most people cannot live without technology.  However, people need to know the fact, that people living in Antarctic having pain and losing their home, because of technology that people live in the world. After Antarctic experienced pain and become refuges, then next refuges will be everyone in the world. Recognize problem and take it seriously will be the first step of a moral obligation.  Some developed countries have already taken a lead in implementing strategies for reduce carbon emissions, which is the main reason of greenhouse gas. For instance, the EU has implemented a successful carbon trading scheme used as a model by other nations. Indeed, the 2006 Stern Report proposed expanding the SU scheme to include as many countries as possible (Steger, 2009. P 95).

obama-epa-greenhouse-gases-800

In New Zealand, there are five 350 organizations: Auckland, University of Auckland, Otago University, Christchurch, and University of Canterbury.  They exist to let people know about climate change, reason and solution. The name of 350 came from the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide. Currently, earth is at 400ppm which is above the safe upper limit. Acceleration of global warming and melting glaciers were due to exceeded level of carbon dioxide emission. Global warming is caused by releasing what are called greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.  Which generated by burning fossil fuels like coal and oil.  The 350 campaign focuses on making the connections between ones actions and climate change easier to understand so one can turn this around (350 Aotearoa).

Rainbow Warrior Arrives in Bali

In New Zealand, there are many environmental groups including Greenpeace, Clean Earth League, Wildlife Conservation Trust, and many other organization to preserve nature and animals. The biggest organization is the Environment and Conservation Organization of AOTEAROA New Zealand (ECO).  ECO is a network of over fifty large and small environmental organizations based all around New Zealand, as well as several hundred individual friends. The core of ECO’s work is promoting and strengthening community environmental action, and working collaboratively towards better government policies and management decisions. Eco also contributes on global issues such as climate change, Antarctica, and oceans.  Greenpeace is another active organization to protect nature in New Zealand, its main activities are preserve forests, defending oceans, agriculture and genetic engineering, eliminate toxic chemicals, and stop climate change. Greenpeace opposes the development and building of fossil fuel energy sources in New Zealand.  They also promoting Marine Reserves which are a scientifically developed and endorsed approach to redressing the crisis in New Zealand oceans which work alongside a range of other measures designed to ensure that the demands they make of their oceans are managed sustainably. Despite of many organization’s effort to preserve New Zealand’s nature, lately, New Zealand government refused to support international marine protection which was approved by massive margin. Which seems like the government chose to listen to the irrational arguments of a few fishing industry lobbyists rather than to the science and the 96 percent of New Zealanders who want more marine protection (Howe 2016).

 

Moore, D.K., & Nelson, P, M. (2011). The Inuit Right to Culture Based on Ice and Snow. Moral Ground: Ethical Action for a Planet in Peril (25-29). San Antonio TX: Trinity University Press.

Climate Change. 350 AOTEAROA. Retrieved from

http://350.org.nz/about/about-climate-change/

Steger, M B. (2009). Globalization: A very short introduction. (2Ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press

What We Do. Environment and Conservation Organization of Aotearoa New Zealand. Retrieved from

http://www.eco.org.nz/what-we-do.html

What We Do. Greenpeace New Zealand. Retrieved from

http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/campaigns/oceans/

Howe, C. (2016, September 10). NZ Government refuses to support international marine protection. SCOOP politics. Retrieved from.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1609/S00115/nz-govt-refuses-to-support-international-marine-protection.htm